| |
|
Levels of Performance
|
|
Criteria
|
Exemplary
|
Proficient
|
Emerging
|
Beginning
|
|
Indicators
|
| Engage reader |
Establishes a context and engages the reader by considering
audience and establishing an authoritative voice with creativity and
a flare for the language. |
Establishes a context and engages the reader by considering
audience and establishing of an authoritative voice. |
Attempts to establish context and engages the reader;
however, introduction is not clear. |
Attempts to establish context, but is weak and/or confusing. |
| Organize and develop persuasive and/or expository writing |
Supports valid arguments with highly effective, detailed
evidence, citing sources of information when appropriate; analyzes
evidence in relation to the thesis; addresses and acknowledges several
counterpoints and advances respective rebuttals; uses several strategies
to persuade, for example, anecdotes, statistics, purposeful use of
language that connotes a clear attitude towards the subject without
becoming emotional, details, descriptions, examples, compare/contrast,
etc.
The response is logically organized from beginning to end and includes
an opening with focused thesis statement, body, and closure.
|
Supports valid arguments with detailed evidence, citing
sources of information when appropriate; analyzes evidence in relation
to the thesis; addresses at least one counterpoint and advances a
respective rebuttal; uses at least one strategy to persuade, e.g.,
anecdotes, statistics, details, descriptions, examples, compare'/contrast,
etc.
Response organized and includes a thesis statement, opening, body,
closure.
|
Attempts to support arguments but some evidence lacks
clarity, accuracy or correct citation; lacks clarity in analysis;
lacks a clear counterpoint and/or rebuttal; uses unclear or ineffective
strategies to persuade.
Response includes a thesis statement, opening, body, closure, but
one or more of these elements not fully developed.
|
Arguments not supported with valid or clear evidence;
interpretations inaccurate and/or not correctly cited; little or no
attempt at counterpoint and rebuttal; little attempt at using strategies
to persuade.
Organization incomplete, or one or more of the elements causes confusion;
thesis statement unclear or absent.
|
| Organize and develop narrative and descriptive writing |
Descriptive writing includes a strong opening and closing;
writing is logical and well-organized; Consistently uses vivid language;
demonstrates a superior use of strong verbs, adjectives, adverbs,
sophisticated vocabulary, a sentence variety.
Narrative writing creates an organizational structure that balances
and unifies all narrative aspects of the story; ideas are clearly
and effectively developed; establishes a situation, plot, persona,
point of view, setting, conflict and resolution; develops complex
characters; demonstrates creativity and a flare for language.
|
Descriptive writing Includes a good opening and closing;
writing is logical and organized; Uses vivid language; demonstrates
an advanced use of strong verbs, adjectives, adverbs, and new/precise
vocabulary.
Narrative writing shows a clear attempt at organization that comes
close to unifying the story; digressions are rare; most ideas are
clearly expressed; provides an adequately developed plot; characters
are adequately developed.
|
Includes a satisfactory opening and closing; writing
demonstrates some organization; an unsophisticated use of strong verbs,
adjectives, adverbs, and new vocabulary.
Narrative writing lacks focus and a controlling idea; digressions
and/or abrupt shifts in the response may interfere with meaning; some
ideas may not be clearly expressed; barely develops the plot and characters
are superficial.
|
Includes a weak opening and closing, writing demonstrates
a lack of organization; uses limited sensory language; demonstrates
little use of strong verbs, adjectives, adverbs, new vocabulary and
sentence variety.
Narrative writing demonstrates little or no organization; frequent
digressions and/or abrupt shifts in the response interfere with meaning;
many ideas are difficult to understand; the plot is difficult to follow
or understand and requires further development. Characters show little
to no development.
|
| Understand English language and world languages conventions |
Demonstrates consistent control of grammar and punctuation
(subject/verb agreement, irregular plurals, pronoun-antecedent agreement,
consistent verb tense, irregular verbs and nouns, parallel structure,
etc.) sentence construction including compound complex sentences,
and spelling. |
Demonstrates control of grammar and punctuation (subject/verb
agreement, irregular plurals, pronoun-antecedent agreement, consistent
verb tense, irregular verbs and nouns, parallel structure, etc.) sentence
construction including compound complex sentences, and spelling; occasional
errors do not interfere with meaning. |
Demonstrates basic control of grammar, punctuation,
sentence construction and spelling; however, frequent errors interfere
with meaning. |
Does not demonstrate control of grammar, punctuation,
sentence construction, and spelling; numerous errors interfere with
meaning. |
| Style and Fluency |
Ideas clearly expressed and fully developed; writing
is fluent and polished with effective transitions. |
Ideas clearly expressed and developed; writing is generally
fluent with appropriate use of transitions. |
Ideas not clearly expressed or developed; fluency and
transitions may be lacking. |
Ideas difficult to understand; fluency and transitions
lacking. |
| Writing process |
Demonstrates application of all steps of the writing
process including evidence of prewriting (freewriting, brainstorming,
item analysis, or clustering); a draft copy that structures ideas
into sentences and paragraphs; a revision that thoroughly clarifies
thesis, form, supporting information, organization, voice, syntax,
diction, mechanics; a final edited draft. |
Demonstrates application of all steps of the writing
process including evidence of prewriting (freewritng, brainstorming,
item analysis, or clustering; a draft copy that indicates an attempt
to structure ideas into sentences and paragraphs; a revision that
clarifies thesis, form, supporting information, organization, voice,
syntax, diction, mechanics; a final edited draft. in which many errors
in spelling, punctuation and grammar have been eliminated. |
Attempts to apply the steps of the writing process.
There is evidence of prewriting and drafting, and attempts to structure
ideas into sentences and paragraphs; a revision in which attempts
are made to clarify thesis, form, supporting information, organization,
voice, syntax, diction, mechanics with help; a final edited draft. |
Some of the writing steps presented but lacks a clear
understanding of the writing process. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Cranston High School West / Cranston
Area Career and Technical Center
School-Wide Expectations for Student Learning / Targeted Achievement
Rubrics
Revised spring 2005
|
|